IdeaJones

Tag: radio

  • Arts Life — Dispatch From The Trenches #2

    As we gather information from those who know about promoting artists and arts groups, we're sharing them. May your art thrive!
    As we gather information from those who know about promoting artists and arts groups, we’re sharing them. May your art thrive!

    Let’s call this one Why Should Anyone Give A Rat’s?

    A conversation I had with someone at a gallery today brought back conversations I’ve had in the past with “gatekeepers,” the people who decide whether or not to cover something. These are editors, producers, reporters, critics — people who look at your press release, press kit, what-have-you and decide if there’s a story there. If they don’t see what will interest a reader, listener or viewer, your event won’t be mentioned.

    I’ve been given some pointers on how to make a project, or event, more appealing to a gatekeeper. I’m sharing what I’ve been told in hopes some of it will prove useful (and so I remember it myself). The idea of this lesson breaks into a few parts, so we’ll start with:

    How are you saying it?

    An idea can be more or less interesting depending on how you put it. I don’t mean “spin,” that manipulation that seeks to gild cowflops and call them gold nuggets. I mean looking at your event for what is new, unusual, or interesting about it. For example: I recently spoke with a man who organizes concerts and musical performances for a nonprofit. He was frustrated by their low success rate at getting noticed in the larger arts scene in the region.

    So we talked about a recent event he’d worked on, a concert by an elderly guitarist. Sounds ripping, right? Well, I asked a few more questions and using the techniques I’d been taught, the concert with the elderly guitarist became a “rare performance by an influential musician, an expert in classical and flamenco guitar…” All of which was true. The man rarely performs any more, and was a teacher who influenced other up-and-coming musicians, including one who opened for him.

    Not spin — what you say must be true and defensible. You should be able to make a strong case for what you’re saying if you need to. Look at your subject. What’s unusual about it?

  • Radiation

    Radiate simply means to spread out from. Spokes radiate out from the hub. Light radiates from the bulb. But “radiation,” that word comes with extra baggage these days. It got me thinking about health, and all our various artificial radiations.

    Take radio and TV transmissions. The signals from every radio and TV station in town are constantly bombarding us. If you have a device with the correct discriminator you can pick one out of the bunch and decode something to watch or listen to.

    But what about all those waves of radiation bombarding us? They’re essentially the same as all the natural waves – solar radiation, the natural radiation from various radioactive elements, and so forth. We’re just adding additional layers of radio waves to the mix. TV stations? Check. Wi-fi? Add that one, too. Wireless remote controls? One more wave dropped into the soup.

    When steeple jacks have to climb past an active transmission antenna, the engineers lower the power to a fraction of its normal output. If they don’t, the workers can get burned. Seriously. It can be just like climbing into a microwave oven.

    All the various waves that constantly bombard us are coming at us at very low (usually) energy levels. That’s why you don’t generally notice them. But what if all the artificial emanations combined with all the natural emanations are just too much for our cellular structures to handle? What if those extra energies being added into our bodies are causing changes? Could it be that the increasing number of instances of cancers and other disorders are somehow influenced by these extra, unnatural energy waves? Just putting that out there. I haven’t done any research that would prove or disprove my hypothesis, but it seems reasonable that adding energy would result in – something.

    Chalk it up to one more possibility for the law of unintended consequences.